Jan 11 2009 by Ken Oxley, Sunday Sun
HOW many cynical old journalists does it take to change an energy-saving lightbulb? Just one, as it happens but he has to be bullied into it by the European Union.
It seems we’re destined to live in a twilight world following an EU decision to replace conventional 100-watt bulbs with greener alternatives. Already stores are running out of our tried and tested bulbs and stocking shelves with the new ones.
I realise, of course, this makes sense. Conventional bulbs are incredibly inefficient, losing most of the energy they produce through heat. But at least they also do exactly what it says on the tin . . . they give off light. Energy-saving bulbs on the other hand are, frankly, useless.
I have a drawer full of them at home, but after fitting one in the spare room and seeing the pathetic dim glow it produced I decided to leave the rest in their boxes rather than stumble around in semi- darkness.
They say necessity is the mother of invention. That being the case, I’d say it’s absolutely necessary for some one to invent a viable alternative to what we’re being offered.
Saving energy is all very laudable, but a lightbulb’s raison d’etre is to produce light. Replacing bulbs that work with ones that don’t is hardly progress.